These comments with vast references to the American political scenarios is too distant for most Malaysian. This I believe mainly of your Amerikana educational or locality. It would be great if such analytical deductions and conclusions made on the past Malaysian political situations in reality.

Granted, if the comments were directly inferred towards current political well-being of Malaysia, most probably unfavorable views of the ruling mecahnisms would have you belled as “enemy of the state” with libellious renditions. Its hard to move forward with half heartened local media reporting of critical events as the mass of Malaysian public is seen needing the “sheep mentality” - do as I say not as I do.

Excuse me if these comments are out of context.

It is undeniable that such phenomenon is rare in the political world. It is almost a common believe that everyone is supposed to be challenging the leader, rather than cooperating in working towards the same objective, each complementing (did I spell this correctly?) the other. My limited experience can only see 2 reasons as to why this happens: The leader is unwilling to pass his position to another more capable person, and the follower (the ones who are challenging) have no clear grasp as to what are the responsibilities they were expected to fulfill as a leader. And this situation becomes a cycle; the follower, when they become a leader, still have no idea what are they supposed to do, and at the same time they are not willing to let those who knows what to do to take their position. Take Samy Vellu for instance.