Did I Teach Spielberg How To Make Better Films?
Mansor Puteh
I just read Christopher Goodwin’s “Lucas’ Touch, Spielberg’s Magic” on their latest film, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, that was republished in the New Straits Times of Malaysia today, 20 May, 2008, two days before the film opened in local cinemas and elsewhere.
In July 1995 I wrote a review, “Spielberg’s films mostly propaganda” for a local paper in which I posed this question: Did I teach Spielberg how to make better films?
I sent a copy to his office at the Universal Studios lot. Later I read from an American trade magazine that the reason why he was reluctant to produce a new Indiana Jones film was because he did not wish to produce one that would leave “a bitter taste in the mouth.”
How could this be so?
As I wrote in my article and reiterated in my letter to him, all first three Indiana Jones films had “crooks” or “bad people” who are of color: Arabs, Muslims, Native Americans, Native Hawaiians, South Americans, Asian Indians, Chinese, and so on.
How could he not feel guilty for doing this notwithstanding the tons of money he was making? Yes, I wanted to make him feel angry and guilty.
I must have had some effect, as some of his later films would prove. Not long after, he produced The Color Purple, starring Oprah Winfrey, about an Afro-American woman in the early years of
It took the team of Spielberg and Lucas to come up with Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull which does not have characters or images that demean
Sometimes I wonder if Soviet or Russian filmmakers had ever made films where their cooks are Americans instead. It would be fun to view such films to study the psychology of the Russian film makers and their audiences.
Spielberg’s “adventure films” (read American adventure films) may thrill many American viewers, but he should not expect those of us from here to feel the same way. Like others in the audience, as a youngster I was confused when I first saw his Raiders of the Lost Ark in
Later as a graduate student at
This forced me to again take a look at Spielberg’s films. I do not want to believe that I had taught Spielberg and/or Lucas how to make better films, although privately that was what I wanted to do with my letter.
I wish Spielberg would use the medium of the cinema more to promote greater understanding between all the peoples in the world. Film makers like him need not be trapped making films that demean others, meaning the people of color, nor do they need to produce films promoting white supremacy.
The world of cinema has not changed much since it was first introduced at the end of the 18th Century. Meanwhile the world has, especially since the “9-11” incident.
Film makers, especially those in
Indiana Jones is no balm. Spielberg and Lucas have a bit more to learn if they truly want to be accepted as filmmakers to the world and not only to Americans and other Westerners.
May 24th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Do wish you learn to be magnanimous as the majority race/dominant force and empathise with the aspirations of the minority/subject out of this episode.
May 24th, 2008 at 6:18 am
But in the first Indy movie, Raiders of the Lost Ark, the principal villians were Germans.
May 24th, 2008 at 11:27 am
I agree with tantor. The villain Belog in Raiders of the lost ark was most probably a French Jew from his insistent of performing a Jewish ritual prior to opening the ark. Indy’s trusted sidekick Sallah (John Rhys Davies ) was probably Egyptian/Arab/muslim and Indy was shown rescued by muslim kids. I do not see a total vilification of muslims or arabs. There were hindu good guys and bad in Temple of Doom, with Chinese mobsters and Indy’s trusted chinese sidekicks.
But the overall villains in the first 3 movies (post WWII era) were mainly Nazis. Speilberg made it clear that he was not labeling all Germans as bad from his movie Schindler’s list, and he lashed back at Israel in Munich (his insertions of subliminal messages that comes together at different points of the movie was masterful) .
And what would be your view of Arab muslims in the 1920-30s tuan doctor? The days of the disciplined and feared Mamluks who drove out the Crusaders and defeated the Mongols were long gone. They were degenerate womanizers before being wiped out by Napoleon (the only thing that somewhat redeemed them currently is that the USMC carries a sword in their name). The Arabs in that era were a bunch of warring tribal lords who just got a piece of new nations after backstabbing their own brethren in faith the Turks. There was nothing much to be shown about those people at that time… The period when western archeologist had no problems getting massive cheap human labour from the populace .
Maybe you are romanticizing the Arabs a little bit too much tuan doctor?